<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-who exactly?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesugarcubes.net/2006/04/21/pro-who-exactly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesugarcubes.net/2006/04/21/pro-who-exactly/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Iman</title>
		<link>http://thesugarcubes.net/2006/04/21/pro-who-exactly/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Iman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesugarcubes.net/?p=244#comment-351</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but may I suggest that he changes landscape? why not resign?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why would he resign? "freeing himself from further responsibilites" as you suggest is supposed to be a viable reason? Why should he give up now? After all wasn't he chosen by the great majority of the Palestinian people (just like the new government was? actually the newly elected government got 43% of votes, Fateh 41% and the PLO factions collectively got 57% ...and when Abbas was elected president, he received 62.5% of the population's votes)

&lt;blockquote&gt; I donâ€™t know why resigning never occurs to Arabs, really&lt;/blockquote&gt;


In Palestine, you're talking about a democratic system unlike the rest of the Arab World ...i.e. Syria, Egypt, Jordan, to name a few so resigning will not occur to them ... How many non-arab presidents resigned? Nixon forced to. And when Jamal Abed Al-Nasser resigned many people took to the streets protesting, wanting  him to stay in office! Again, President Abbas (executive) was chosen by the great majority of people - those same people who chose Hamas (legislative). Being president gives him presiding power over decisions, veto power, the final call is his call. So if you want to get down to being supportive, you'd expect that the legislative branch (Hamas) is the one who should be more supportive!


&lt;blockquote&gt;Obviously itâ€™s because of being occupied that they are not allowed to have one&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 as hamzeh says, But  there are Palestinian Security Forces! I believe 3800!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but may I suggest that he changes landscape? why not resign?</p></blockquote>
<p>Why would he resign? &#8220;freeing himself from further responsibilites&#8221; as you suggest is supposed to be a viable reason? Why should he give up now? After all wasn&#8217;t he chosen by the great majority of the Palestinian people (just like the new government was? actually the newly elected government got 43% of votes, Fateh 41% and the PLO factions collectively got 57% &#8230;and when Abbas was elected president, he received 62.5% of the population&#8217;s votes)</p>
<blockquote><p> I donâ€™t know why resigning never occurs to Arabs, really</p></blockquote>
<p>In Palestine, you&#8217;re talking about a democratic system unlike the rest of the Arab World &#8230;i.e. Syria, Egypt, Jordan, to name a few so resigning will not occur to them &#8230; How many non-arab presidents resigned? Nixon forced to. And when Jamal Abed Al-Nasser resigned many people took to the streets protesting, wanting  him to stay in office! Again, President Abbas (executive) was chosen by the great majority of people - those same people who chose Hamas (legislative). Being president gives him presiding power over decisions, veto power, the final call is his call. So if you want to get down to being supportive, you&#8217;d expect that the legislative branch (Hamas) is the one who should be more supportive!</p>
<blockquote><p>Obviously itâ€™s because of being occupied that they are not allowed to have one</p></blockquote>
<p> as hamzeh says, But  there are Palestinian Security Forces! I believe 3800!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamzeh</title>
		<link>http://thesugarcubes.net/2006/04/21/pro-who-exactly/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamzeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesugarcubes.net/?p=244#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Well there already are Palestinian security forces so I don't see why they need to create a new one. I think the Palestinian armed groups should be simply integrated into this already existing force instead of existing on its side and competing with it for rule and the right to enforce order.

When Yasir Arafat, God rest his soul, was in power he as president clashed with his prime minister over who will control the security forces. Back then the US had been backing the prime minister on the issue of controlling the security forces but Arafat never gave up. Today the same scenario is repeated, there is a clash between the Palestinian president and his prime minister over control over the security forces.

The common denominator between the two incidents? The US backed Mahmoud Abbas. He was the prime minister in the first incident, and now he is the president. Back then he wanted the prime minister to hold control of the security forces, today I'm not sure he likes to talk about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there already are Palestinian security forces so I don&#8217;t see why they need to create a new one. I think the Palestinian armed groups should be simply integrated into this already existing force instead of existing on its side and competing with it for rule and the right to enforce order.</p>
<p>When Yasir Arafat, God rest his soul, was in power he as president clashed with his prime minister over who will control the security forces. Back then the US had been backing the prime minister on the issue of controlling the security forces but Arafat never gave up. Today the same scenario is repeated, there is a clash between the Palestinian president and his prime minister over control over the security forces.</p>
<p>The common denominator between the two incidents? The US backed Mahmoud Abbas. He was the prime minister in the first incident, and now he is the president. Back then he wanted the prime minister to hold control of the security forces, today I&#8217;m not sure he likes to talk about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaden</title>
		<link>http://thesugarcubes.net/2006/04/21/pro-who-exactly/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesugarcubes.net/?p=244#comment-349</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bashir&lt;/strong&gt;, no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bashir</strong>, no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bashir</title>
		<link>http://thesugarcubes.net/2006/04/21/pro-who-exactly/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>bashir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesugarcubes.net/?p=244#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding my blog to your links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding my blog to your links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
